Would the 36 work in a matchless-styled head cab?

Double-Bubble! Place for discussing the 36W version...

Moderators: colossal, zaphod_phil, CurtissRobin, Daviedawg, Graydon

Post Reply
NitroLiq
Verbose poster
Verbose poster
Posts: 1537
Joined: Thu 02/03/05 2:00 am
Location: NYC

Would the 36 work in a matchless-styled head cab?

Post by NitroLiq »

Rather than than the smallbox with the chassis resting on the bottom, tubes/trannies on top....would it be possible to out them in a Matchless-styled head cab which is kind of like an inverted small box....chassis on top with tubes/trannies hanging down?
0 x

rjgtr
Builder, Admin
Builder, Admin
Posts: 6668
Joined: Wed 11/24/04 2:00 am
Location: Jax, FL
Contact:

Post by rjgtr »

Sure it would work, you'd just need to get some new faceplates.
0 x

NitroLiq
Verbose poster
Verbose poster
Posts: 1537
Joined: Thu 02/03/05 2:00 am
Location: NYC

Post by NitroLiq »

Haven't bought faceplates, yet, so I guess that's good! Still thinking about the cab/panels as I work through my build (at a snail's pace).
0 x

User avatar
ChrisGS
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun 09/25/05 2:00 am
Location: Unknown

Post by ChrisGS »

I think that maybe it's better to have the tubes on top of the chassis so that the heat from the tubes can rise away from the chassis , keeping the componants somewhat cooler , rather than having the chassis mounted "upside-down" .

I don't have any proof of this , it's just my guess .

Chris.
0 x

rjgtr
Builder, Admin
Builder, Admin
Posts: 6668
Joined: Wed 11/24/04 2:00 am
Location: Jax, FL
Contact:

Post by rjgtr »

Chris,

As anyone who's owned a Fender or Marshall combo can attest, it is better for cooling to have the tubes on top. However, as long as the opening in the back is large enough, down hanging tubes shouldn't cause a lot of problems. A lot of Fender and Traynor heads have the tubes hanging and have been ok for 3 decades.
0 x

Post Reply