Epiphone Valve Standard to 18W TMB Conversion

18watt-specific Tech Talk - Building, Fixing, Parts, Mods...

Moderators: zaphod_phil, Daviedawg, Graydon, CurtissRobin, colossal

bigjoe
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat 03/31/07 2:00 am
Location: Unknown

Post by bigjoe »

Go to: http://www.allenamps.com/
Click transformers on the left. scroll down. Not sure why link didn't work as thats what comes up when I navigate to it.

“What happens, for example if you reduce VR1 until the sound is clean and then bring up the volume level on VR6?”
reducing VR1 until clean and bring up volume it stays clean. Theres not a lot of knob bewteen Clean and dirty though. With master up its too dirty for me at around 10 o’clock on the the gain knob.

Maybe I’m being picky. As I said I can live with it, just though I would ask.
0 x

User avatar
zaphod_phil
Builder, Admin
Builder, Admin
Posts: 15208
Joined: Wed 03/19/03 2:00 am
Location: YYZ

Post by zaphod_phil »

bigjoe wrote:Go to: http://www.allenamps.com/
Click transformers on the left. scroll down. Not sure why link didn't work as thats what comes up when I navigate to it.
OK, I had a look at this transfomermer, and although it would work, it's clearly a Fender replacement OT and not a Marshall 18W transformer. So while it may sound fine, you won't get *that* legendary 18W tone out of it. Also, with the 7K primary impedance it will make the power amp break up somewhat sooner. IMHO, I would save your money up for a real-deal 18W OT from GDS(Heyboer), Brownnote or Trinity, say. Those also have three speaker impedance taps, for 4, 8 and 16 ohms, rather than just for 4 and 8 ohms.
bigjoe wrote: Theres not a lot of knob bewteen Clean and dirty though. With master up its too dirty for me at around 10 o’clock on the the gain knob.
OK, so it's mainly the range on the MV you're concerned about? Did you change the two EL84 grid leak resistors, R22 and R23 to 470k? I don't remember if I recommended you to try that or not. If you did, you may need to reduce them again...
0 x
Nature abhors a clean tube amp

bigjoe
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat 03/31/07 2:00 am
Location: Unknown

Post by bigjoe »

Phil Pg 9 2nd post down Quote:
"Currently with the 220k grid leak resistors (R22 & R23) on the EL84s, the power amp will stay chimey and clean until driven pretty hard, like a Vox amp. You can experiment with larger values, such as 330k or 470k to get more 18W style power tube overdrive. "
"OK, so it's mainly the range on the MV you're concerned about? Did you change the two EL84 grid leak resistors, R22 and R23 to 470k? I don't remember if I recommended you to try that or not. If you did, you may need to reduce them again... "
See first quote above in this post. When I read the part about chimey and clean I decided not to change R22 & R23 from stock values.

Its the gain I think I'm worried about. I'd like loud and clean, or loud and slightly overdriven. It just seems that theres not much in between clean and heavy overdrive. I usually play with the MV up and the gain turn fairly low.

THanks for you thoughts on the transformer also.
0 x

bigjoe
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat 03/31/07 2:00 am
Location: Unknown

Post by bigjoe »

Got an update.

My gain pot was bad. I pulled it and it was very erratic when checked with DMV. Resistance would bounce around quite a bit. I know its supossed to change as you turn the shaft, but this would bounce by thousands and never really settle on a value. I changed it, and I think it fixed my overdrive problem.

While changing pot I decided to change my MV wire to R17 and wire from MV to C27. Just wasn't happy with it, wire was very stiff and awkward. Used 2 conductor wire this time as opposed to braided shield. I grounded one of the 2 conductors (one end only) to the PCB. I would imagine this is OK. The factory wiring on this amp used a similar setup as opposed to shield braided wire.

I have more headroom before it gets too dirty. Over all, the overdrive is much smoother even when pushed.

While I had it apart I decided to try a few of Phil's suggestions I had not yet implemented. I change R22/23 to 330K. Also changed R15 in the tone stack to 56 K.

I happy with the tone, nice chimey bite. Well defined highs and mids and the bass is solid.

Volume not as loud when cranked. Once I get past 12 o'clock on the MV I have no noticable increase in volume. I mentioned this previously, thinking I was wrong to be able to use it all. I think Phil concurred I should probably have more volume.

Still fizzy as ever.

Mods to date:
* C3 .01 uf (forgot to mention this previously)
* 1 meg across outer lugs of VR4 (forgot mention this previously)
* R8 and R9 820 from 1.5 K
* C1 uF from 22uf
* C9 removed.
* R12 and R13 100K from 1 meg
* VR6 shielded wire to R17. (one end of shield grounded to PCB)
* Isolated SS via jumpers next to R17 (JP73 is actually C7) and VR6 (JP76).
* Removed 47K resistor off VR6
* Power amp coupling caps C5 and C6 changed to .01 uF from .022 uF
* R25 and R26 1K 5watt from 100 3 watt
* R24 180 5 watt from 120 5 watt.
* 5 9 V zeners (5 WATT) in series placed in circuit at FS3. (Pin 7 343 volts on EL84's)
* R21 PI cathode bias resistor changed to 470 (previously 820) from 1.2K
* C12 1000 uf 35 volt from 100 uf 35 volt
* R17 220K (from 470K)
* 1 Meg resistor across VR6 Master Volume
* R22/23 330K from 220K
* R15 56K from 33K

Probably buying new OT within 2 weeks.
0 x

User avatar
dthill
Unrated
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu 05/18/06 2:00 am
Location: Edmond, OK

Trying to do some of these mods I've

Post by dthill »

screwed up the PCB. It's got a pretty good crack in it now. I asked my tech about it (in general terms) one day and he said to trash it. Is that what I should do Are they not repairable? Are there replacements? Use the cab for another amp or what?
Not trying to hijack this thread, actually I want a mireacle of some type!

dthill :cry:
0 x

User avatar
zaphod_phil
Builder, Admin
Builder, Admin
Posts: 15208
Joined: Wed 03/19/03 2:00 am
Location: YYZ

Re: Trying to do some of these mods I've

Post by zaphod_phil »

bigjoe wrote:I have more headroom before it gets too dirty.
* R17 220K (from 470K)
If you find it's breaking up to early on the MV, increase R17, either back to 470k, or the in-between value of 330k. If you lose some high end with that, you can always place a bright cap across it, say 250pF.
bigjoe wrote:Volume not as loud when cranked. Once I get past 12 o'clock on the MV I have no noticable increase in volume. .. I think Phil concurred I should probably have more volume.
A cranked 18W amp should be diabolically loud, assuming reasonably efficient speakers. However Marshall 18W amps are also well known for getting loud and breaking up quite early on the dial, then not getting much louder - just dirtier. You can adjust the breakup point by increasing R17.
bigjoe wrote:Still fizzy as ever.
It shouldn't be fizzy. Can you explain more about when you get the fizz? Do you get it with the MV turned down? In any case an upgraded OT will probably fix it.
bigjoe wrote:Probably buying new OT within 2 weeks.
Perfect! If it's a genuine 18W OT it should improve the tone of your amp a whole lot.
dthill wrote:screwed up the PCB. It's got a pretty good crack in it now. I asked my tech about it (in general terms) one day and he said to trash it. Is that what I should do Are they not repairable? Are there replacements? Use the cab for another amp or what? Not trying to hijack this thread, actually I want a mireacle of some type!
The solution is pretty simple. Swap the board. Gibson should be able to sell you a replacement PCB. Do the mods on it first, before you fit it into the amp. Alternatively, just buy yourself an 18W TMB board from any of the outfits selling TMB boards - eg Trinity, Ceriatone, s2, etc. Just tell them that you don't have space for a Normal channel in your amp, so you want the first triode on the preamp to be wired in parallel. Also tell them that you're using solid-state rectifiers, so you need a sag resistor included. That will give you a full-blown TMB 18W amp, especially if you also upgrade your PT.
0 x
Nature abhors a clean tube amp

User avatar
hartwell
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon 10/09/06 2:00 am
Location: Waverley, NS, CA

Re: Trying to do some of these mods I've

Post by hartwell »

zaphod_phil wrote:Alternatively, just buy yourself an 18W TMB board from any of the outfits selling TMB boards - eg Trinity, Ceriatone, s2, etc. Just tell them that you don't have space for a Normal channel in your amp, so you want the first triode on the preamp to be wired in parallel. Also tell them that you're using solid-state rectifiers, so you need a sag resistor included. That will give you a full-blown TMB 18W amp, especially if you also upgrade your PT.
Sounds like a great idea. I guess the OT as well ...?
0 x

User avatar
zaphod_phil
Builder, Admin
Builder, Admin
Posts: 15208
Joined: Wed 03/19/03 2:00 am
Location: YYZ

Re: Trying to do some of these mods I've

Post by zaphod_phil »

hartwell wrote:Sounds like a great idea. I guess the OT as well ...?
The amp will work with the stock OT. It will sound killer with a real deal 18W OT!
0 x
Nature abhors a clean tube amp

bigjoe
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat 03/31/07 2:00 am
Location: Unknown

Post by bigjoe »

If you find it's breaking up to early on the MV, increase R17, either back to 470k, or the in-between value of 330k.
I'll try the tweener 330k. I'll liked the tone with the 470K value actually. It's not bad its definatley brighter with the 220K value.
A cranked 18W amp should be diabolically loud, assuming reasonably efficient speakers. However Marshall 18W amps are also well known for getting loud and breaking up quite early on the dial, then not getting much louder - just dirtier. You can adjust the breakup point by increasing R17.
Diabolically loud?? This is defiantely not that, its loud though. Thats one of the reasons I dropped R17 to the 220K value. Hoping to get more volume.

I'm using the stock speaker. I also borrowed a cab from a friend that had 2X10" celestions in it, can't remember model. I tried with 2X10 celestions I had from one of those micro stacks, but my 1X12 stock speaker was louder in either case.

The fizz seems to be present pretty much at any time. Low, High volume does not matter. The MV and Gain configuration do not matter either. Its just there all the time. Not nearly as noticable at lower volume, which I guess is some what expected.

I've been traveling the last week and a half and before I left last weekend I had water in my basement. If you live in states and have seen the news in the last week you probably know that close to Kansas City is flooded. I had my amp taken part before I left and I have not had a chance to tinker at with yet. I'll try the tweener R17 @ 330K and probably order a Hyober OT once my I get the proceeds from my travel voucher back.

Just my 2 cent on the PCB. Is it a huge crack, you know like hal way across the PCB? If there is any board around the crack that does not have traces across you could try and stop drill the crack. Its good enough for aircarft wings why not an amp PCB. I trashed a few traces on my board and I got creative with some fairly large solid copper wire, like for house wiring, to fix the larger traces. The smaller traces can be repaired with the scrap pieces of the components conductor that you cut off after installing them. I did PCB repair for about 2 years on car computers right out of high school. If you have a good mechanical connection there is no reason it should not work.

If your board is cracked nearly all the way across or something really bad like that I would just trash it as someone suggested (probably not worth all the effort). I had plans of using my Valve Standard cab and chassis for an amp I was going to build from scratch (I got it on the cheap), but I liked the sound of it, it just needed some help.
0 x

bigjoe
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat 03/31/07 2:00 am
Location: Unknown

Post by bigjoe »

Changed R17 to 330K. I like this value there. It doesn't break up nearly as early and is a lot smoother when it does. Just need the OT at this point.

Mods to date:
* C3 .01 uf
* 1 meg across outer lugs of VR4
* R8 and R9 820 from 1.5 K
* C1 uF from 22uf
* C9 removed.
* R12 and R13 100K from 1 meg
* VR6 shielded wire to R17. (one end of shield grounded to PCB)
* Isolated SS via jumpers next to R17 (JP73 is actually C7) and VR6 (JP76).
* Removed 47K resistor off VR6
* Power amp coupling caps C5 and C6 changed to .01 uF from .022 uF
* R25 and R26 1K 5watt from 100 3 watt
* R24 180 5 watt from 120 5 watt.
* 5 9 V zeners (5 WATT) in series placed in circuit at FS3. (Pin 7 343 volts on EL84's)
* R21 PI cathode bias resistor changed to 470 (previously 820) from 1.2K
* C12 1000 uf 35 volt from 100 uf 35 volt
* R17 330K w/ 220 pf cap (from 220K [200k broke up too early] from original 470K)
* 1 Meg resistor across VR6 Master Volume
* R22/23 330K from 220K
* R15 56K from 33K
0 x

User avatar
zaphod_phil
Builder, Admin
Builder, Admin
Posts: 15208
Joined: Wed 03/19/03 2:00 am
Location: YYZ

Post by zaphod_phil »

Looks good! Like I said, this amp should be very loud, just like any other 18W. Certainly it should be plenty loud when you get your new OT in - unless your speakers are inefficient....
0 x
Nature abhors a clean tube amp

bigjoe
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat 03/31/07 2:00 am
Location: Unknown

Post by bigjoe »

phil,

One thing I noticed is the fizzy sound gets worse with my strat Bridge/Neck pup in series. I modded my strat with this pup combo. Just the neck pup is fizzy, but much more noticable with the presumably higher output of the series Neck/Bridge pup combo. I have a cheap epi SG knock off I bought for the kids with cheap HB pups and its even worse than my strat.

Thought it might be worth mentioning, maybe not.
0 x

User avatar
zaphod_phil
Builder, Admin
Builder, Admin
Posts: 15208
Joined: Wed 03/19/03 2:00 am
Location: YYZ

Post by zaphod_phil »

First upgrade your OT to a real 18W clone OT. Then let's see what fizz is left, if any.
0 x
Nature abhors a clean tube amp

bigjoe
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat 03/31/07 2:00 am
Location: Unknown

Post by bigjoe »

Probably going with this one. I really want to play out with this amp.

http://www.gdsamps.com/18wattbuyparts.html

scroll to #13a.

Any opinions? $75 includes shipping. Its at the top end of my affordable.
0 x

bigjoe
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat 03/31/07 2:00 am
Location: Unknown

Post by bigjoe »

I'm curious about something. What would happen if I reduce R1 to a lower value. Would it result in more volume? I don't plan on doing this I'm just curious. I'm going to be mod-free until I get the OT.

Well hopefully mod free after that also.
0 x

User avatar
zaphod_phil
Builder, Admin
Builder, Admin
Posts: 15208
Joined: Wed 03/19/03 2:00 am
Location: YYZ

Post by zaphod_phil »

No, it would just give clearer high frequencies from your guitar. Basically more definition and sparkle. I usually use a 10k value for the input grid resistor, instead of the old Fender 68k, but you can short it out entirely if you want. 10k still gives some protection against radio stations breaking in.
0 x
Nature abhors a clean tube amp

bigjoe
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat 03/31/07 2:00 am
Location: Unknown

Post by bigjoe »

Phil, are you out there?

I think you'll be happy to hear that I ripped out the PCB in the Epi and put an 18 watt TMB circuit in its place with point to point wiring. I also installed the GDS 18 watt OT.

I love the OT.

I've got it playing pretty good I think. Its only one channel, so I paralleled V1 with itself. I used a schematic form 18 watt. Its mostly stock except for a 1000uf cap and 180 R on the power amp cathode.

Sounds good with one exception below.

I'm getting a strange static noise when I pick a note and hold it. As the note rings there is a static like noise that tails off with the note. I've gone over the solder and double checked component location/values. It is worse with the MV cranked, but I have with the volume cranked also, just not as bad. Should I be looking hard ariund the PI?
0 x

bigjoe
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat 03/31/07 2:00 am
Location: Unknown

Post by bigjoe »

Got an update.

I connected the PI input and cathode resistors directly to the sockets (470K ran separately to 2,7 and 820 on Pin 3 jumpered to 8 ). This fixed the "static" problem. I got the idea from reading posts about pin 2 on V2, and saw some posts mention they put the resistors right on the pins on the PI also. Maybe it was resoldering the wire or slightly repositioning it, but its working. No more static.

Its sounding good. I get a squeal with both MV and V dimed, but I can't see myself ever needing to have this configuration.

With MV at about 6 o'clock and Volume dimed, the lows get a little mushy and undefined with the neck pup. This is normally my favorite position to play in. I love the tone of this pup.

I said earlier the only change to the stock circuit I made was the cathode bypass cap on V4/V5. Actaully I increased the cathode resistor on V1 to 2.7K, and tone stack slope resistor is 33K. I'm thinking of putting V1 cathode R back to 820. Could this be make the low end mushy? I have it this way on both V1 cathodes, could that be overdoing it a bit? I'll try different value tomorrow, to late now.

The neck pup tone sounds a little "womanish", but I suspect taking care of the undefined low end might help this.

I do like the warm clean tones I get by rolling the git volume back a little bit to take the bite out. Or with MV and V both on 6 it sounds great.
0 x

User avatar
zaphod_phil
Builder, Admin
Builder, Admin
Posts: 15208
Joined: Wed 03/19/03 2:00 am
Location: YYZ

Post by zaphod_phil »

So you've basically completely replaced the guts of the Valve Standard you had?
bigjoe wrote: Actaully I increased the cathode resistor on V1 to 2.7K, and tone stack slope resistor is 33K. I'm thinking of putting V1 cathode R back to 820.
Yes, reducing the cathode resistor back down to 820 ohms will definately bring the low end under control a bit better. Also I reckon you'll prefer the amp's tone with a 56k resistor in the tone stack. IMHO the mid emphasis can be excessive with a 33k in there, unless playing Strats most of the time. Your treble cap in the tone stack should also be 470pF, not 250 or 270pf, like in the JTM45 and some of the 18W TMB schematics.
0 x
Nature abhors a clean tube amp

bigjoe
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat 03/31/07 2:00 am
Location: Unknown

Post by bigjoe »

So you've basically completely replaced the guts of the Valve Standard you had?
Yes, I did completely replace the guts. I thought that might actually make you happy, but I think about how you helped me trying to get that PCB to sound right. I apologize for that, but this valve standard will not be the beta version of an 18 watt conversion unfortuantely. I do appreciate all your time and expertise on this project and hope your not insulted by the fact I pulled the PCB. There was another member who I have kept in touch with who may still be modding.

Around the time I got the GDS OT the 18watt went on vaction. The amp sounded bad with the new OT. I got quite frustrated trying to work around the PCB. I was getting a lot of oscialltion, due to how I had to lay things out on the PCB I think. I had most of the components on had and I decided to trash the PCB. This was before I knew the board was coming back on line, and I was a little desparate. Best decision I’ve made as far as this amp is concerned, that and the OT. The only stock items from the Epi are the chassis, jacks, the PS, and speaker. I like the speaker BTW.

I only play strats, I have it modified with a push-pull pot switch to change pup configuration. That’s about as close to a HB as I get. I have a 1959 Silvertone hollowbody w/ the original DeArmond soapbar pups that’s gets some time also. Played very little the last 30+ years.

I remember putting that 33K in there, and trying a 56K at one point, and went back to the 33K. I think that was when the PCB was still in the amp though. I’ll throw a 56K in there and see what happens just for the sake of doing it. The schematic I used did have a 250pf cap in the tone stack, but I think I used a 470 pf based on previous posts with you. I’ll have to check that.

Phil I apologize once more, but I am much happier with the amp though. Not to mention it’s a dream to work on. Much easier to debug also.
0 x

Post Reply